Note: This story was dynamically reformatted for online reading convenience. MPAs in public life - vignettes Present as DHM case files? Or just short stories? If DHM case files, lead in with explanation that the stories are reconstructions from the MPA internal log records. Include 'Restricted, DHM level 3 and above only!' - a description of the MPA hidden logging. Uses molecular storage, many terrabytes in pinhead sized components. Record all MPA and physiological channels in real time, plus sound. Data can be and is often secretly retrieved during visits to DHM clinics. plenty of scope for some hot vignettes here: * Dominant man/woman controlling their spouse. Org-denial, humil, submission, etc. The law mandates the husband to be 'responsible' for his wife. But doesn't always work that way. Penalties at law for wife convicted of 'usurping husband's role' include public humiliation, nudity, court-assigned MPA scheduling (incl in public, nude), etc. * Parents controling their children. Teen girl & boy sexuality controlled by dads & mums. - Frustrated widdowed 33yo mum still has husband's remote unit. She decides 18yo son's penis is too small, needs many hours of rigid erection every day to help it grow, but no masturbation and only once a month orgasm-free mini-emissions - which she supervises. She also gives herself multiple orgasms per day, while fantasising about her son's near-permanently rigid cock and extreme hornyness. After eight months, DHM learns of the situation and investigate. Medical advise that the boy has developed chronic and possibly permanent case of priapism even with the MPA inactive. Penis enlarged well above average, ditto prostate. Recommended treatment: very frequent natural intercourse to orgasm, until his complaint resolves. Secret Immorality Tribunal rules that the full rights and morality administration capacity of the father transfer to the son in this case. But that in the circumstances pregnancy should not be allowed. The mother is given tubal plugs, and the family MPA remote is placed in his care. In remedial therapy sessions, mum is bound naked, and remoted into extreme arousal, then son required to fuck her. Also instructed on use of the remote, particularly the management of excessive female libido, arousal profiling for obedience, and 'orgasm choices' (ie how rarely if ever to let her have any.) The judgement specifies that as punishment for her mistreatment of him, she must serve an orgasm-denial twice the interval he endured - ie 16 months. This must be served in one continuous interval, that is, if he permits her orgasms before the interval expires, it resets to zero, starting again. They are required to return weekly, and their MPA logs downloaded and analysed. His prescribed target is 5 or more ejaculations into his mum each day, to continue as long as his 'priapism' remains. (Defined as one or more spontaineous erections of longer than half an hour, at any time during the day, at least two days during a 7 day interval.) Any orgasms she is recorded to have had, are fully investigated- she must list them, describe each one's circumstances, whether she had permission, etc. On each visit her MPA is recalibrated - ability to bring her to extreme edge of orgasm without relief is tested for a one hour interval. --------------- - Dads in a neighbourhood hatch plot to coordinate their 'management' of teen daughters' sexuality. Ostensible purpose is to encourage the girls to do their school homework, get good results in class, do household chores, not go out much, keep their rooms tidy, etc. They set a scale of punishments and rewards, and a rating system in which all the girls get a score (0-100) based on their achievements. A girl's 'score' sets her 'regime' for the next week. All girls set for boosted libido and once daily edging, to enhance motivation. 90+ A two hour session of multiple orgasms, each week achieved. 80+ One orgasm allowed per month of continuous 80+ scores. Orgasms are only allowed during an Awards Ceremony at the weekly community meetings. Naked, partially restrained, on the hall stage, with all parents and other sons & daughters observing. In consideration of the shyness factor, participants will have their arousal level assisted via remote. Single orgasm reward winners will self-administer by masturbation. Orgasms not taken are forfeit. Multiple orgasm winners will be fully restrained and provided mechanical stimulation. 70- Only skirts allowed, mid thigh or shorter, underwear not permitted. 60- Edging increased to twice daily, more libido boost. 50- Naked at all times within home. 40- Constant swollen arousal, edged four times daily. 30- Naked at all times, school, public and private. 20- Public spanking at the community meeting. Naked, restrained, on stage, edged for two hours after. 10- Must provide sexual relief to family members whenever requested. Spanking for non-cooperation. 5- Inflating butt-plug with tail and vaginal extension worn at all times. Only removed by a family member for toilet visits. --------------------- - Young woman, 24, still living at home with parents (mid 40s) and younger 17yo brother. Dad is away a lot. Dad finds out mum & daughter were having fun fooling with son's MPA (org denial, forced orgs in their presence, etc.) Dad responds by giving younger brother the remote while he's away. Dad tells both women he's delegating son the responsibility, and they must accept his decisions or be charged under the new laws. Gives son full permission to 'manage' them however he likes. Signs affidavit to that effect, registered with DHM. He leaves for a six month overseas posting. Son turns out to be very inventive. MPA set to 'no conception'. Son turns up the women's hornyness, disables orgasm, informs them the only way they can come is to ask his permission. He'll only permit it after they perform set tasks. The first task is to remain fully naked at all times in the house for seven days, then on the 7th day, to orgasm they must masturbate on the dining room table while he watches. The 'task' period will only begin once they have BOTH asked his permission to orgasm, with both present. (So one of the women will end up begging the other to agree.) In the mean time, they have to take turns giving him head each morning. -------------------- - Hacker kid gets codes for single mum & daughter next door. They are on the default MPA 'community program' for their area, which at this time isn't very active. They don't have a remote, just being administered by the wifi network. He starts by nightly bringing them to high arousal in their sleep, so they awake swollen, aching and soaking wet. But of course, with 'sexual touching' strongly disallowed. He discovers that he can analyse their telemetry and determine in real time if they are wearing clothes, by the MPA's taps into the sensory stream from nipples and labia. Starts making it uncomfortable for them to wear clothes while home. Increasing intensity. One day when they are both home, naked and achingly aroused, he 'accidentally' walks in on them. Acts shocked that they would expose to each other during obvious MPA sexual exercising, and suggests he should report them. They beg him not to, afraid to have their unusually strong carnal desires exposed to official notice. He sympathises, and mentions that he might be able to do something to help them - he knows someone who might be able to get a blackmarket MPA remote, which would allow them relief without showing in the MPA logs. Are they interested? He says he'll enquire, they can think about it a few days. But they'd have to do something for him in return. Says he'll think about that too. He'd be keeping the blackmarket remote 'for obvious reasons'. Over next few days he ups their erotic dreams, and daytime arousal levels. Also writes up the 'agreement' - that effectively they agree to be his sexual toys, in return for orgasms when he allows them. When he returns a few days later, they are more than eager to say yes. They are taken aback by his terms, but soon agree. Sign his paper. He produces the 'black market remote' (one he built himself) and demonstrates it works. "But before going any further"... he takes pictures of them, naked, panting, clearly horny and needy. He has another remote keyed to his own MPA, and although his cock is already ramrod hard, he sets it to 'rigid erection continuous, no orgasm, no ejaculation'. Sets theirs to high arousal, extreme sensitivity, no refractrory period after orgasm, orgasms on remote command. And starts fucking them. For the entire day. He allows them one orgasm each early on, then no more till late afternoon. Then he gives them *many*, and allows their arousal to fade out, their pussys sore but satisfied. Making a show of 'wiping their MPAs back to normal', he leaves, saying he'll be busy for a few days, they can come and ask him if they need anything. He takes the remote. That night they sleep soundly, no sex dreams. But over the next few days soon return. By the end of the week they ask him for relief again. He acts surprised "What, so soon!? I thought this wouldn't happen very often. It's a bit risky you know. What if DHM...? Oh all right. But not till next Monday, and you can suck me off now and each day till then." So it goes... he gives them fewer and fewer orgasms over the months, while getting them to do more and more kinky stuff. --------------------- - Boss with a DHM universal remote, catches his secretary stealing, and makes her accept his full control of her in return for not having her arrested. (She'd be subjected to full MPA control incl total org denial in gaol anyway.) ------------------ - Two young women living at College are caught in a lesbian affair; also using a black market MPA remote to enable them to have lesbian sex. They are subjected to 'sexual psych testing', then a brief closed hearing by the Immorality Tribunal. During the hearing they are naked, on DHM restraint racks, with a vaginal exercisor fitted but not yet turned on. Found to be Domestic Amoralists, they are sentenced to corrective detention at the pleasure of the DHM. The vaginal exercisors are turned on, they are gagged and rolled over to the row of other women already convicted that morning at the Tribunal. The transport truck will arrive later in the day. For now, they serve as visual reminders of the authority of the Tribunal. --------------------- Wealthy & religious family employ several live-in foreign maids. When MPAs become available, they include MPA wearing in the employment contract, with remote in their care. For some months they only log arousal and orgasm. (which turn out to be nearly nightly.) Then they announce new conditions of employment, given that their staff are so clearly impure. - masturbation/orgasm without permission is not permitted. Punishment for initial offense is a naked caning, followed by a week of nudity, during which arousal set high, orgasm locked, no-touch. Repeat offenses get worse. - 'Sinful feelings & thoughts' (spontaneous arousal) must be confessed to employers the same day. Pennance is to wear a very skimpy maid's costume for next 2 days of duty, with no underwear. Penalty for NOT reporting sinfulness similar to for masturbation. - Maids confessing sinfullness must 'dissipate their sinful urges'. Their 'orgasm count' is incremented by 10. All maids wear their current count on a tag below their nametag. They have to work these orgasms off while bound naked to a statue of Priapus in the main entrance hallway - but can only do so during their days off. Obviously, only one girl at a time can use the statue. The girl with the highest count has priority. --------------------- Schools - after compulsory MPA fitting introduced, school sex ed class teachers issued with universal MPA remotes, but which can't alter long term programming. Only work in proximity. Sexual exercising during medical exams, DHM sexual competency tests/ ---------------------- Married woman, 25 (MPA fitted) leaves husband 28. Had been married 4 years. Cause: he's smitten with another woman, though hadn't been unfaithful. But had lost interest in sex with his wife. He'd set her MPA to allow masturbation, but disallow intercourse. Leading to her severe frustration, since she was naturally highly sexed and demanding. So she'd left, penniless, and moved back in with her well off widdowed mother, 45. Tearfully tells mum of his cruelty, etc, how she'd been left to take care of her needs by herself, etc. Mum isn't impressed - what's she having to do herself? Not to mention the times she caught the girl masturbating as a teen. Nor amused about lack of grandchildren. She quietly applies for an MPA remote, on the basis she's now responsible for her daughter. Mum proceeds to humiliate and train daughter to be sexually submissive, while keeping her husband informed. Husband marries the other woman (who dislikes first wife.) New wife gets on fine with mum. They start to have regular family get-togethers at mum's place, during which all three entertain themselves playing with & tormenting 1st wife. The new couple come for long stays at mum's place. 'Cum-easies' - underground nightclubs, where black market MPA remotes are set to broadcast to all, with venue DJs running the music and the MPA remotes. Dances become highly erotic group orgasms. ---- Single working girl (clerical), Cathy, 25, no boyfriend. She joins the program early, voluntarily. On the application form, she lists 'preventing embaressment' as one of her reasons for joining. Due to this, she's given a special pre-install interview. She's evasive, but hints at problems she has wearing a bikini at the beach. Sent for physical. Discovered to have an exceptional clitoral development - during brief internal pelvic exam her clit erects very rapidly, but remains trapped under it's hood, obviously causing her some discomfort. When this doesn't resolve after a few minutes the doc manipulates it, and it pops out to over an inch long. She no longer seems in pain, but now is intensely self-conscious. Full body blush, also Even more unusually, the erection does not diminish over the subsequent course of a 60 minute AJP 'lifestyle options' verbal questionaire, deliberately intended to be boring and non-sexual - though during this she is still naked on the exam stirrups. At the completion of the form, the examining doctor comments that she's having a persistent engorgement, and she seems uncomfortable (she's still squirming her hips). He questions her directly about her clit, and she shyly admits it often does this, sometimes for whole days at a time, and is distressing. She has difficulty sleeping (has to take sleeping tablets) and makes going to the beach impossible at those times. She's always nervous about going, in case it happens while she's there - as it seems to do, if she even thinks about it. Doctor gives her a 'more thorough' exam - during which he gives her g-spot prolonged massage, bringing her very near to orgasm, then backing off. Repeatedly, while questioning her about her sexual history. She becomes semi-hysterical, cries she can't stand that, must he do it? This is the worst feeling - always unbearable, she dreads it, now she will ache for days. He concludes that she's never had an orgasm, doesn't know what one feels like! Gives her a 'relaxing' shot', actually a hypnotic. Puts her under, questions her under hypnosis about her past. She is not a virgin, has had several brief boyfriends. But all had only fast sex with her, none brought her to orgasm. All put off by her 'penis'. As a child she'd had a very strict mother, and been soundly conditioned against 'touching herself'. When her clit erects, trapped in it's hood, she finds the discomfort unbearable. She's learnt to release it for relief from the pain, but that just makes it feel 'naughty', and with it released the erections tend to last much longer -days instead of hours. At the beach, she has the choice of bearing the discomfort (with only a small bump in her bikini) or releasing it (sometimes can happen by itself) but this results in an unbearable social embaresment, as her bikini sticks out in a way no one can ignore. It's only happened a handful of times in her life, but it's mortifying. Worse, after such times the erection always persists intensely for several days. So much so that she's had to take sick leave from work, and could barely think of anything for those days but the looks people had given her on the beach. She says she's never been able to bear to touch it for more than a moment - it's too sensitive, and just makes her feeling of 'ache/congestion' so much worse. He has her accepted on priority, with special 'research stream' MPA administration assigned to himself. (Unknown to her.) Aranges for her to see him regularly for followups. Pulling strings via DHM, he has her fired from her job. On 'hearing of her unemployment', he offers her a clerical/reception job at his practice. Which she accepts. He begins giving her regular hypnosis sessions to 'help with her problem', but really to bind her to his will. For starters. He also has her agree to a small surgical proceedure, to eliminate the discomfort of having a clit erect under her hood. He partially removes the hood (so that her clit is permanently exposed) while also cosmetically enhancing her labia. He includes some piercing grommets along both labia. In the hypnosis sessions, he conditions her to become ever more aroused, being triggered by seemingly trivial things in her daily work. He implants sexual imagery associated with such things. She wears a 'nurses uniform' he provides. He reduces the skirt length till it's almost micro. The blouse is very shear. He declares that she must wear no underwear or bra. He installs a new chair at her reception station. Behind a solid desk front, it features a phalic 'probe' that both measures her 'condition', and can stimulate/punish her. ------ In a series of court cases, corporations extend the definition of their own corporate 'personhood'. It is determined that corporations are effectively able to declare their own gender, with the default being 'male personhood'. As a consequence a high court case rules corporations have legal right to include 'moral guardianship' clauses in employment contracts. Which can now specify details of the employees' 'sexual lifestyle' on the basis that it impacts on their work (attentiveness, motivation, health) and also the corporate image. Both single and married persons may be hired with consideration of their willingness to accept such clauses in their contracts. Corporate advertising begins to reference the mandated 'corporate sexual mores' of their employees. After further court cases, it becomes accepted that corporate requirements for their employee sexual conduct may differ significantly from conventional moral norms, and may include severe non-disclosure clauses. All justified on the grounds of maintaining economic competetiveness and unhindered proprietry business models. The secretary and personal assistant unions attempt industrial action in protest, calling the situation 'outright sexual slavery' and alleging instances of extreme misconduct. But with unemployment being high, find that many others are willing to accept the 'sexual specifics clauses' contracts. The protests fizzle out entirely when the DHM conduct morality audits and adjustments on the organisers. Some corporations implement company wide MPA regimes, of varying strictness. Others are more flexible, allowing delegation of MPA remote operations to individual management, with effectively unlimited scope for performance incentivisation. In practice, it turns out that many single women find it preferable or necessary to transfer their MPA management from their parents/guardians, to their employer. The phrase 'married to your job' takes on a new meaning, as many employers introduce sexual incentivisation programs, with both rewards and penalties based on work performance. ------- Certain categories of foreign nationals, resident in the USA on work or study visas, required to wear MPAs as condition of residence. Several justifications are put forward, such as eliminating the 'anchor baby' phenomenon, and monitoring incidents of 'sexual terrorism', after a spate of very public sexual assaults on citizens by non-citizens. (actually staged) In some cases MPA monitoring falls to the DHM, but mostly to the School/University or employer. Publicity campaigns styled to appeal to various significant ethnic groups are undertaken, beginning with the 'young Asian female student' demographic, since these are so photogenic. -------- Regulations issued allowing the Department of Social Security to apply MPA 'performance guidlines' to welfare recipients. -------- Cynics organisations form isolated communities of resisters against the DHM and their compulsory MPA fitting programs. After some time the government declares them 'fugitives from sexual oversight' and in many cases also subversive. They conduct raids. All 'fugitives' from age 10 up are fitted with DHM-monitored MPAs. Those not considered also subversive are allowed to return home. The others are sent to DHM camps. Naturally the selection is based more on sexual attributes than political. Part of the process is a two week interval, naked in small solitary confinement cells, with MPA set to induce high levels of horniness but no other restraints. They are read the Acts of Public Morality legislation defining their sexual 'rights', given a written copy, told they are under 24/7 surveilance, but nothing more. Those who masturbate (which is illegal) are naturally deemed to be sexual subversives. -------- At one of the secret DHM 'research camps' a group of teenage 'sexual fugitives' end up in a program to explore the more esoteric capabilities of the MPAs. There are 10 males and 10 females, all 16 years old. The researchers are three female and two males. The project objective is to determine to what extent the MPA glandular-hormonal interfaces can influence physical enhancement of the sexual organs and glands. All set to constant genital arousal, no touch, no orgasm. Genital growth hormones cranked up. In males, prostate and seminal fluids production set higher. In females, fluids production in G-spot glands set higher. ---------------------