- NND ---------------------------------------------------------
Visit my FTP site: ftp://ftp.asstr.org/pub/Authors/Roller/ <--click
Click, or put the address into your browser. All my stories are there.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Rape is Good
Or: An Essay to Promote Human Understanding
I am striving to create a menÕs movement to equal and counter the
feminist movement that has arisen in America over the last quarter
century. The so-called ÒIron JohnÓ movement came and went in the
1980Õs. But hanging out in the woods with a bunch of sweaty guys beating
on drums never appealed to me. Frankly, it sounded like something that
would only appeal to men who were gay. In my opinion the only thing that
matters is females. And they are interesting in inverse proportion to
their age.
Just as there is feminist literature, there needs to be menÕs
literature. The feminists have erected a canard that radical feminist
ideals represent the ÒnormÓ. In this view male behavior is labelled
ÒdeviantÓ, even criminal. It is time for male opinions to have the same
validity as female opinions. To this end, I am helping to create a new
literature, which I call Òpedophile fictionÓ.
Not that there is any such thing as pedophiles, of course. It is
traditional and right for males to like young, attractive females.
Meanwhile females seek out males who are older than themselves. When a
man looks at a female one of the things that is uppermost in his mind is
her suitability for bearing young. If she is young (say, 10-years-old), she
is an ideal candidate because she is:
a. Not already pregnant with some other manÕs child.
b. Unlikely to be already married or engaged to be married or have a
serious boyfriend.
c. Unlikely to be infected with sexual diseases.
The fact that a 10-year-old might be too young to get pregnant is
nearly irrelevant; with the passage of only a year or two, she will be
sufficiently old.
This of course is only the girl as seen from the physical and
reproductive angle. As far as her mind is concerned, she is very enjoyable
to be around, not old and weighed down with thoughts of miscarriages,
abortions, or the Òbeen there, done thatÓ attitude.
From the female perspective, the female needs someone who is older
and can protect her and her (as yet unborn) babies. Traditionally this
protection was needed not just from other human beings, but also from
animals, such as lions, tigers, and bears.
Because females are looking for different things than what males
are looking for, in terms of a prospective relationship, feminists have
been able to draw a line between the genders. Then they say that all
people, both male and female, should be on their side of the line. ÒRapeÓ
looms large in the feminist universe, as if it is a fate equal to death.
Indeed, under the current regime of male-hating laws, some men even
wind up being rapists who go on to kill the female, handing the feminists a
further argument against male behavior.
It is time to return to first principles. Feminists have said that all
men are rapists, and indeed there is truth to the statement. Let me define
males and females in their most elemental state, so we can understand
the matter completely, without any error.
First, females are created to be raped. That is why their body
weight is less then menÕs. They are to be pursued and raped, so that they
will get pregnant and bear young.
Men, on the other hand, are created to be effective rapists. They are
faster and stronger than women so that they can catch them and fuck
them. It is important for men to be sexually attracted to the youngest
possible females, since it is important, in a state of nature, for the
female to get pregnant and start bearing young as soon as possible. After
all, if a lion eats her at age 15 it would be best if sheÕs had three or four
children by then.
At the same time, in a state of nature it is best if a manÕs sperm is
not wasted. Sperm exists to create babies, and wasted sperm canÕt do
that. Hence the taboos against gay sex, anal sex (with a female), sex with
animals, sex with the dead, and sex with human females who are too young
to conceive.
Just as it was said that Ògreed is goodÓ, I am here to state the
simple fact that rape is good. A rapist will have more babies than a non-
rapist, because he will have sex with more females. In the natural world,
what matters is numbers. More babies means the group as a whole has a
better chance of surviving. This was especially true for most of human
history, when life was particularly difficult and babies often died.
Females are baby machines. They are not anything else before that,
though of course in our modern age they may be other things as well.
Indeed, some females, thanks to technology created mostly by males, are
free to have no babies at all.
Males, on the other hand, are insemination machines. This is why
females and males think differently about each other. Female desires are
no more ÒnormalÓ than male desires. They are simply different. Men are
not in need of reform, they think like nature programmed them to think.
One should not be criticized for thinking as nature programmed you to
think.
Hopefully I have now cleared up all the misunderstanding between
the sexes. Feminists should understand what men are, and what they
themselves are, and not try to change men. Certainly, there may be a few
gay guys or bi-sexual guys who think more like a woman than like a man.
Oddballs exist in every realm of life, and no doubt gays and bi-sexuals
would be quick to argue that they are not so odd as that statement would
imply. But males, with their urges and desires that feminists are so quick
to criticize, are not evil or aberrant. To emphasize this point I am trying
to create stories in which the male is, indeed, what feminists would
pejoratively call a ÒpedophileÓ. He is a Òchild molesterÓ, no doubt about
it. He is even a Òchild rapistÓ, as the author of the American Constitution
was, with his slave girl Sally Hemmings. But he is also a fine fellow. A
normal man, with normal male desires. Sure, if he looks at a female, even
a little girl, he is likely to size her up first and foremost by her physical
attractiveness, before moving on to assessing her personality. How could
it be the other way around? We are not telepaths. When we see a person
for the first time we see them as a physical being. We have no idea about
what is going on in their mind. We may guess, but the guess could be
wrong. But by God if she has a nice set of tits we see that right away!
We, as males, are programmed to. And donÕt tell me females donÕt have
their own little mental code books that they go by to quickly assess if a
guyÕs ÒcuteÓ or not. Of course they do. The first thing that people do when
they meet is assess each other in terms of their suitability for mating.
That is our purpose. Mating is the most important, for without mating
there will be no humans.
Naturally people have different tastes. And, as mentioned earlier,
the various societal taboos that have evolved are designed to avoid the
wasting of male sperm. Take another taboo: incest. Here the problem is
not the wasting of male sperm, but the fact that incest, especially if
practised over time, produces retards. Always one must look at the
answer provided by the natural world, before becoming tangled up in moral
arguments.
With so-called Òpedophile fictionÓ, we will be able to see a male in
a non-pejorative environment. If one places the story in the future (or the
past) one can write about human relationships, unpolluted by subplots
about police investigations and courtroom dramas. ÒPedophile fictionÓ is
a good start toward building a male literature to match feminist
literature. I encourage other males, and females who have some
understanding of males, to write Òpedophile fictionÓ and post it on the
Internet. If you prefer male protagonists who like older females, so be it.
But the pedophile angle heightens the tension and allows, in my opinion,
the Ôbattle of the sexesÕ (between feminism and masculinism) to be more
thoroughly explored. After all, writing about Ôboy meets girlÕ from a
traditional, non-feminist and non-pedophile perspective runs the risk of
simply rehashing stories that have been told since time immemorial. To
get the attention of the feminists and refute their arguments directly, one
must wrestle with the differences of opinion between masculinism and
feminism, not simply retell Two Gentlemen from Verona.
I hope you will look forward to more of my postings, and hopefully
you will post as well, or are already doing so.
Tonight I have posted Girl Patrol, chapters 10, 11, and 12.
holy joe concurs:
I heartily agree with PerplyÕs essay and with his viewpoints as
expressed in his ongoing story. Males must confront feminism and correct
its excesses or they will be destroyed by it. So far, from what I see, guys
have just been trying to go on with their lives: earning money, watching
sports, building roads and bridges and digging out survivors from the
World Trade Center bombings.
Several perspectives are available for responding to the feminist
threat:
a. The viewpoint of AfghanistanÕs Taliban and Osama Bin Laden.
They say that a woman should wear a chador, a black garment that covers
her from head to toe. She should be escorted by her father until she is
married, and then by her husband. This arrangement would make so-called
ÒlookismÓ impossible, and rape, whatever its merits in the natural world,
unlikely.
b. The viewpoint of the Christian Bible, both the Old Testament and
the New. The Bible says that woman was created to be a Òhelp mateÓ to
man. Also, women should keep silent. This arrangement would cut down
on a lot of feminist theory, since women would not be able to rant in the
university and on T.V. (Or from a JudgeÕs bench.) It would also match the
ordinary order of things. Men donÕt get pregnant and canÕt provide milk to
infants through their chests, so they are free to go out into the world and
do things. Women, fulfilling their function as baby machines which nature
intended, are able to ÒhelpÓ the man by taking care of his children and
keeping a home for him.
c. A humanistic perspective, where people are free to pursue their
own interests, without becoming entangled in feminist-written laws. The
humanistic perspective recognizes that males and females are
programmed by nature to think differently, since they have different
functions. As stated above, women are made to get pregnant (raped). Men
are made to be rape machines. While the civilizational mode of human
existence (invented only 6,000 years ago, after millions of years of
evolution), may attempt to fiddle with human perceptions and desires, it
cannot hope to change the basic, fundamental nature of men, or women. It
is time to recognize and accept men for what they are, and not try to
change them with radical feminist legislation. It is time, too, for men to
stand up. There needs to be a way to do this without becoming mired in
Christian revivalism or looking like a bunch of gays or sissies. Guys, are
you up to it? Or are you going to continue to let radical feminists rewrite
our laws, turning you into Òsex offendersÓ, ÒpervertsÓ, ÒpedophilesÓ,
Òchild molestersÓ, and ÒrapistsÓ, all of those terms having a negative
connotation.
You may wish to visit the Kingdom of the Dominant Women (a real
place, by the way) but do you really want to live there? For your entire
life? Do you want feminists bitching at you every day of your life telling
you that you, as a normal male, are somehow perverted? Do you want
these feminists, along with shameful male collaborators, locking you up in
prison? For life? Telling you that youÕre ÒsickÓ and insane?
Stand up, men! (And boys.) Stand up and find a way to be counted, to
have your voice heard. Every day feminism continues to encroach on our
values and our way of life. It pollutes young females and turns older
females against us. Feminism began with asking for the right to vote and
has now turned into a war machine, denying men their right to simply be
themselves. As I said at the beginning of this essay, if men do not
confront feminism and correct its excesses, they will be destroyed by it.
They are already being destroyed by it! How much additional destruction
is needed before men put a stop to it?
Perhaps Osama Bin LadenÕs bombing can be seen as a benefit, for it
does make ÒlookismÓ look rather silly. But one large explosion will not
stop the feminist virus. It is like a biological weapon, working its way
through our universities and from there into our legal system.
I agree with PerplyÕs proposition, that rape in the natural,
fundamental sense, is good. And I say these things are good too:
pornography, child pornography, prostitution, child prostitution, child
molesting, sexual harassment, and, of course, that bane of Western
civilization: ÒlookismÓ.
Obviously there are variants of the above that are unfortunate, even
unwanted. Some men are wife-beaters. But we do not outlaw marriage.
In the same way we should not view negatively the things which I have
listed above. Some child pornography is undoubtedly abusive. But some is
not. Indeed, I would argue that most is not, or would not be, if child
pornography was not classified as illegal. The same is true of
prostitution. As for sexual harassment, it is perfectly fine as long as it
is done in the proper spirit. If it is done in an attempt to engage the
female in a consensual relationship, there is nothing wrong with it,
provided it doesnÕt go on to an extent that it becomes truly annoying. This
doesnÕt change the fact, as Perply stated, that Òrape is goodÓ. He is saying
that Òrape is goodÓ in the sense of the natural world, viewing men and
women in their most fundamental way. Obviously in our contemporary
society one would not like to see someone forced into sex, or for that
matter harassed into sex, or even into an unwanted conversation. But to
say that a man cannot look at the breasts of a woman walking down the
street, or whistle at her, is ridiculous.
Why are we here? Some have asked this question. Nature has a
ready answer: to mate. And why, you might ask, are we here to mate?
Because we die. If we donÕt hurry up and mate, particularly in the rough
and ready world in which we evolved for millions of years, we wonÕt be
here anymore. Thank God men lusted after women in the past, and raped
them! Why, if they hadnÕt, perhaps there would be no people on the earth
today. Without people, there would be no math, no science, no reading or
writing. Lust is the most important factor in human existence. We must
stop demeaning lust. Life is only possible IF there is lust. Let us walk
again in the bright sunshine of love and humanity and leave behind the
contorted perversions of feminism. The Catholic church wandered into the
Inquisition, but it wandered out again. Early Americans wandered into
witch trials, but they wandered out again. Our modern society has
wandered into a thicket of bizarre labels: Òchild molesterÓ, Òsexual
harasserÓ, etc. Let us leave this briar patch behind.
30
----------------------- Dreamgirls! -----------------------
-- More stories at: http://groups.google.com/ Search by typing:
roller666@earthlink.net Click on ÒPower SearchÓ
Change ÒstandardÓ archive to ÒcompleteÓ archive.
-- Other providers:
IFLC: http://assm.asstr.org and http://asstr.org
AnyaÕs LilÕ Hideaway: http://www.insatiable.net/
Silver: http://www.mr-yellow.com/goodies
The Backdrop Club: http://www.backdrop.com
Usenet Newsgroup: alt.sex.stories.moderated
-- Great art books by David Hamilton and Jock Sturges are at:
http://www.amazon.com http://bn.com (photos of naked little girls)
-- Naked little girls/politics: http://www.AlessandraSmile.com
Man/boy love: http://www.nambla.de Politics: http://www.lp.org
http://www.isil.org http://www.fear.org http://www.fija.org
http://www.aclu.org
-- Naughty Naked Dreamgirls (Library of Congress ISSN: 1070-1427)
is copyright 2001 by Andrew Roller. Dreamgirls, Naughty Naked
Dreamgirls, and NND are registered trademarks of Andrew Roller.
All rights reserved.
-- Visit me at: http://home.earthlink.net/~roller666/index.html
Or at http://www.asstr.org/~Roller/index.html
(It is case sensitive, i.e. type Roller, not roller).