Celestial Reviews 38 - Nov 18, 1995
Note: As I read the a.s.s. postings, I often find among the wannafucks a
message or two bewailing the lamentable quality of stories on a.s.s. I
honestly don't see the point these people are making. While I agree that
there are numerous weak stories in the postings, there are also some really
great stories on a.s.s. - enough to keep even the most prolific reader
occupied during his/her relatively private sexual activities. The stories
that I review in this issue are evidence of that high quality. In fact, I
would venture to say that fully half of the stories that I am reviewing in
this issue would be acceptable in good, reputable magazines, except that their
content makes them unsuitable for general circulation. Even the weakest of
today's stories is a highly creative endeavor that happens to be flawed by
serious grammar mistakes; and I personally find it reassuring that so many
writers on this newsgroup work so hard to remove errors in grammar and style
from the stories they post here.
I hope some of you keep that in mind when you read a good story. Our authors
don't get paid - except in terms of the occasional feedback they get from
readers. I now I enjoy friendly comments from my readers, and I imagine the
other authors do too.
Writing Celestial Reviews and related stuff has continued to be fun. The
activity actually helps keep me sane - if that's possible. Now that I have
reviewed my 300th story, I would like to comment on an interesting irony.
When I first started writing these reviews, I used to draw on "normal"
American and world literature to clarify points to the a.s.s audience. (For
example, I have had a lot of fun developing the theory that Deirdre is
Sherwood Anderson reincarnated - more on that in a future issue! Even if most
of you don't know what I'm talking about, I did get a rise out of the only
person in Clyde, Ohio, with an AOL account.) But last week the situation
reversed itself: I found myself in front of a class of eager high school
students and I wanted to take an idea from an a.s.s. story to clarify a point
about "The Scarlet Letter." No can do!
The paradox is that a large number of a.s.s. people (especially those who
bother to communicate with me) are highly intelligent and creative. Dare I
say it - some of them are even brighter and more creative than some of my
colleagues in the Teachers' Lounge! I am finding the a.s.s. atmosphere in
many cases to be more stimulating (no pun intended) than my ordinary academic
life; and the result has been that I am (1) becoming a little more creative
myself and (2) I can't tell anyone about this. Well, it *is* an irony. You
can decide for yourself if it's interesting.
- Celeste
"Experiment" by Deirdre (mind control) 10
"Field" by Deirdre (I'm not sure) 9
"Fixup" by Deirdre (voyeurism) 5
"Walk" by Deirdre (outdoor sex & voyeurism) 8
"Droit du Signeur" by Lysander (history & romance) 10
"Wet Dream" by Caesar (sex in the great outdoors) 5
"Taking Chances" by Frank McCoy (incest with very young
child) 7
"NICE" by Vickie Tern (revenge & kinky sex) 10
"Experiment" by Deirdre (an65862@anon.penet.fi). Ah! Another mad
scientist is at work in the laboratory of Deirdre's mind. This one
finds out that one of her female students is attracted to a
cheerleader, and the scientist promises to turn the cheerleader over as
a sex slave if only the student will make love to the mad scientist.
Sounds good? Read on! (Rating: 10)
"Field" by Deirdre (an65862@anon.penet.fi). A college girl shares an
apartment with her girlfriend. The girlfriend acquires a boyfriend,
and he moves in with them. The boyfriend and girlfriend split up, and
the girlfriend goes home to mother, leaving the original girl and the
former boyfriend living together - but not sexually involved. The
boyfriend decides to play the field for a while. Pretty soon there are
women marching in and out of the boyfriend's room. This confuses the
original girl, because the boyfriend strikes her as rather bland.
Pretty soon the boyfriend's women are multiplying faster than rabbits
with calculators and are overflowing the apartment. Then the
girlfriend comes back and asks if the boyfriend has been seeing anyone.
This story certainly held my attention! (Rating: 9)
"Fixup" by Deirdre (an65862@anon.penet.fi). The boss's wife seems to be
jealous of the female employee. She invites the employee over and
tries to fix her up with a date. When the boss takes the employee
home, they double back and peek in through the window and see the wife
and the other young man making out. Just when the story starts, it
stops! It certainly leaves a lot to the imagination. (Rating: 5)
"Walk" by Deirdre (an65862@anon.penet.fi). "It's so dark and lonely out
here at 3:00 a.m. that I could dance naked in the street and no one
would notice!" That's not the sort of thing a woman says out loud in a
Deirdre story - at least not unless she expects some consequences.
(Rating: 8)
"Droit du Signeur" by Lysander (Lysander@vnet.net). This posting of
Chapter 8 represents what I'll call the rejuvenation of one of my
favorite long stories. In my original review of this story, I reported
being wonderfully excited at its beginning and then disappointed as it
seemed to loose its steam. Eventually, it just seemed to stop.
Lysander reports that he had written the beginning of a garden
rendezvous between Tomas and Esmerelda immediately after she leaves
Kirsten and Heinrich in Chapter 6. It was supposed to be tender and
uplifting, a life-affirming act between two people who needed each
other; but it was also incredibly cloying. Nevertheless, he stubbornly
stuck with that plan from the middle of '93 until two nights before he
posted Chapter 8. Then he took a 90-degree turn and it practically
wrote itself. The result is much darker than he had intended, and it
will be interesting to see how the story eventually fulfills its
original potential
HERE'S WHAT I HOPE: I hope Lysander breaks with the a.s.s. tradition
of "improving" stories by just adding new chapters. He wrote four
brilliant chapters and then three chapters that seriously limped.
Instead of just adding eight more chapters, he should go back at some
time and revise the weak chapters. In some aspects of life it is
necessary to live with our mistakes and to correct old weaknesses by
merely adding new strengths; but this is not necessary with electronic
publishing. All an author has to do is revise an old chapter and push
a button and <poof!> the bad parts of the story are gone and the story
becomes much better. The only authors I know of on a.s.s. who
consistently do this are Backrub and the Ng Sisters. These are some of
the best authors on the newsgroup: there's a lesson in this.
The elderly among you will perhaps remember the old "Dallas" TV series.
The writers of that series wrote once themselves into a corner when
they killed a major character. Then the character came back to life
the next season, and they tried to reconcile this contradiction by
saying that the death had been only a dream. Since evening soap
viewers are not as sophisticated as a.s.s. readers, this approach
worked. But on the Internet this approach is not even necessary. It's
perfectly fair to simply revise the earlier episodes - don't kill OJ or
JR or whoever in the first place. Lysander has some serious weaknesses
and contradictions in Chapters 5 through 7. If he both (1) finishes
the story and (2) gets rid of these problems, he will have written one
of the best sex stories ever.
Let me be clear about one thing: Lysander is already one of the best
and most versatile authors on a.s.s. He doesn't just repeat one plot
with minor variations; his stories range from the thrilling and even
brutal to the sentimental. I have given him high ratings for other
stories. But this story has the potential to be his very best - IF he
will revise it as well as finish it. The reason I am saying this in a
public review instead of in a private letter to the author is because
numerous other writers can benefit from the same advice. Consider
revising and altering your stories to improve them when you repost
them. I advocate treating the stories like successive versions of
computer software. I eventually want to see Droit du Signeur 2.0.
This strategy has worked for Bill Gates and for numerous software
developers. Believe me; it will work here too.
Anyway, since Lysander has reposted the original episodes, here is my
original review:
Nice story! That was my reaction after I read the first chapter and
plunged ahead into the second. This tale takes place in Germany during
feudal times. In those days the lord of the serfs had the right to
have sexual relations with a new bride on her wedding night. The hero
and heroine in this story initially resist this as a barbaric custom;
but eventually they comply.
This story borders on greatness. At the end of the third chapter, I
was truly impressed. But then the author gets sidetracked on tales
about warfare and torture. These chapters are not bad; in fact they're
good - but perhaps a little too detailed. The problem is that the
author never gets back to a full treatment of the sex and romance. All
of a sudden the story just ends, and we are informed that Heinrich
married Esmerelda (who is barren) after miraculously rescuing her from
Assan and that Kirsten will have Heinrich's baby. There's a lot more
room for development and resolution here. For example, how will Tomas
(Kirsten's husband) react to this state of affairs, and how does
Kirsten feel about her husband?
When sex occurs, it is really hot. In addition, the plot allows room
for real sexual tension and creative character development. Assume
that there really is a rule that the lord gets the bride on the wedding
night and that the bride can help her husband (who has attacked the
lord) only by making the lord as happy as possible. She expects the
lord to be an asshole; but instead he turns out to be a responsible
ruler and kind lover, whose happiness apparently arises from making her
happy. How should she react? There's an important moral and emotional
angle here, which is worth developing: should she let herself go and
enjoy the pleasures she has been offered, or should she hold back her
true affection for her husband? If she does react favorably to the
lord and if she does conceive a child, how will this affect her love
for her husband? And then there's Esmerelda.... These and many other
dilemmas could make this into a story that is not only titillating, but
also just plain good literature.
The author starts with a great plot for the first few chapters - a plot
that involves real personalities - and then settles for a war story,
purely hormonal sex, and an ending that leaves us hanging. At the
beginning, this story reminded me a lot of the movie "Indecent
Proposal," in which Demi Moore's husband was offered a million dollars
if he would let her sleep with a rich guy who looked a lot like Robert
Redford. But "Indecent Proposal" maintained the moral and potential
ambivalence all the way to the end of the story. In addition, Demi
Moore's sexual activity was not purely hormonal. I hope the author of
this story realizes what he has here and goes back and turns it into
the work of art it could become. (Rating: 7)
"Wet Dream" by Caesar (jsharpe@access.awinc.com). This is a really
weak presentation of a really interesting idea. An older adolescent
boy comes upon a younger adolescent girl in the woods. She starts to
masturbate but becomes aware that someone is watching. The boy remains
unseen but gives the girl instructions to continue masturbating. The
problem with the story is that it is full of simple grammatical errors
that are terribly distracting. I simply do not understand why creative
authors cannot take the trouble to make their stories presentable
before releasing them to a wider audience. (Rating: 5)
"Taking Chances" by Frank McCoy (mccoyf@millcomm.com). Here we have a
story about a man with a frigid wife and a hot daughter whom he starts
humping when she is nine years old. The wife is actually a nice
person, whom both the husband and daughter love, and so they try to be
discreet. But then it becomes obvious that the wife, who is sterile,
is thrilled at the idea of the little girl becoming pregnant by the
father. This heats up everyone's sex life. Eventually the family
visits an unnamed, utopian city in an unspecified, out-of-the-way part
of the United States, where down home hospitality is a way of life,
where incest is the norm, and where Mom, Dad, and Marlene could raise
their children/grandchildren in blissful harmony. The sad thing is that
they leave this Walden-like paradise behind; but the good news is that
Mom's sex drives are coming alive, and they always have the 800 number
of the Society For the Preservation of Incest in America.
I guess if we function in a science fiction world where there's no such
thing as harm from genetic inbreeding and where nine-year-olds suffer
no psychological trauma from being boinked by their daddies but
actually have their personalities enriched by becoming pregnant before
they are teenagers, then this is a kinda sexy story.
I might add that in real life if I clearly believed that this was
happening to a child for whom I was teaching I would be required by law
in my state to report my suspicions to an appropriate agency. I have no
problem with this law. As an educator I am aware of the very real
effects that genetic inbreeding can have on the intellectual ability of
the cute little offspring of incestuous matings. (The problem is one
of increased probability of double recessive genes, which would be much
less likely to occur among unrelated sex partners. People often make
crude jokes about parts of the country in which fathers are reputed to
have children by their daughters; and while these jokes are certainly
rude, they are not entirely fiction.) In addition, in real life (as
opposed to this story) incestuous relationships often do entail an
abusive use of power that results in personality dysfunctions. I've
seen these very real results and am not amused by them.
The preceding paragraph does not mean that I think the author is a
pervert or that this is a bad story. In my American literature classes
I require my students to read a short story about a maniac who kills an
old man because he doesn't like the ways his eye looks, then chops up
his body and buries it under the floor, and then sits on top of those
very floorboards and casually talks to the police officers until the
beating of the telltale heart becomes so loud that he blurts out that
he committed the crime. I require them to read another story by the
same author in which a man gets revenge on his enemy by burying him
alive in a wine cellar. I have a colleague (more sinister than myself)
who requires his students to read a novel about a man with an
incredibly insipid personality and vacuous system of morality who is
nonetheless labeled as Great in the novel's title. I have even tried
to get my students to read a lengthy tome about a blasphemous ship
captain who sails around the world and has nearly his entire crew
killed while he tries to get revenge on a huge mammal that he
incorrectly refers to as a fish. Need I go on? My point is that many
of the finest leaders of our nation have read and enjoyed these stories
without being corrupted by them.
I am not so blase as to believe that there is no potential for harm in
this story. Nor am I putting this story on a level with the stories to
which I have alluded (except, of course, "The Great Gatsby"). What I
am saying is that I think we can agree that reasonable readers should
be able to read a well written story and refrain from imitating
obviously inappropriate and socially destructive behaviors. I know I
can. In fact, in the many years since I have read Poe, I have buried
alive only two people (not counting lawyers and a lexicographer); and
both of them were English professors anyway.
As for the author - I doubt that he's really a pervert. In fact, I
would be willing to let him babysit for my own children, as long as the
surveillance cameras were working.
But I digress. The story was clearly written and fairly creative.
There were points at which it got to be just too much to believe, and
toward the end it began to sound like an infomercial or a chamber of
commerce pamphlet; but on the whole I found the story to be
interesting. Just remember: you can go to jail for doing things like
this. (Rating: 7)
"NICE" by Vickie Tern (vickietern@aol.com). The title refers (among
other things) to the fact that the husband wanted to be nice to his
wife by engaging with her only in the nice kind of sex she wanted,
which was generally placid and rare. Away from home he was selected as
a sexual playmate by a coworker with decidedly anti-nice tendencies.
That torrid and kinky affair came to an end and vanished into the past.
However, from the very beginning of the story we know that the man's
wife is a vindictive sort: to her a deal is a deal; and if she'll sue
the painter for finishing a job late, we can just bet that she won't be
very nice to a husband found to be unfaithful to the marriage deal.
Now my Word Count utility tells me that I am 2929 words (259 lines)
into a story that is 10858 words (1022 lines) long, and the wife has
just found out that this sweet little husband has been unfaithful. As
you know, I like sweet cuddly sex; and I don't like stories in which
someone is humiliated sexually. And you must certainly realize that if
my husband were ever similarly unfaithful to me, I would simply pat him
on the head, ask him not to do it again, and beg his forgiveness for
failing to be the woman he deserved. If you believe that, then you're
a few french fries short of a Happy Meal and I have a snippet of
Princess Di's cunt hair that I'm willing to sell you at a bargain
price. Au contraire! This author has my permission to have the wife
do anything she wants to this slimeball for the rest of the story; and
I'm going to enjoy all 7929 words (763 lines) of it!
And the plan for revenge that the wife outlines is ingenious. I've
never thought of this method of revenge before. As the wife dictated
her terms to the husband, I couldn't help thinking that the plot
rivaled an Edgar Alan Poe story in its macabre thoroughness. But hark!
The story has a surprise ending; and that's putting it mildly. I
cannot tell you more. Read this story. You'll love it. (Rating: 10)
TIP OF THE WEEK: In each issue of Celestial Reviews I present one of
the guidelines from Celestial Grammar, which I have posted on alt
sex.stories.d. and which I'll continue to develop and revise from time
to time. My theory is that if all of these tips were followed, about
95% of the really distracting errors in a.s.s. stories would be
eliminated. (The other 5% will eventually be covered in Advanced
Celestial Grammar.) I was going to name this part of the column TIP OF
THE {something sexual}, but I thought the innuendo might detract from
the sober serious business at hand. Here is this week's tip:
THE SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD
In the present tense the subjunctive is usually the infinitive of the
verb (that is, the form of the verb listed in the dictionary). In the
past tense the subjunctive looks just like any other past tense, except
for "were," which is the past subjunctive of "to be."
The subjunctive mood states a requirement, a desire, or a suggestion;
or it states a condition that is contrary to fact.
The previous sentences make the subjunctive sound harder than it really
is. The following examples will probably sound natural to native
speakers of English.
His wife suggested that he fuck himself. {suggestion}
His wife requested that he lick her cunt. {suggestion}
I insist that you be here for supper if you expect me to eat you
out afterwards. {Requirement}
I wish that I were a more competent cunnilinguist. {Desire}
If I were you, I would be in love with me. {Condition contrary to
fact}
There are really only two problems with the subjunctive. First, many
writers don't know about the subjunctive or feel uncomfortable with it,
and so they "talk around" it. For example, instead of the first
example they may say:
His wife suggested that he should fuck himself. {suggestion}
This is not actually a mistake; it just misses the opportunity to use
the subjunctive, which I think is a little more elegant.
The second problem is a little more serious: many writers tend to use
"was" instead of "were." For example, in the fourth example they may
say
I wish that I was a more competent cunnilinguist. {Desire}
If someone says this to you, the socially appropriate response would be
to make a quick estimate of whether you want this person to give you a
demonstration. If he/she looks like a major turn-off, reply
"You mean 'were.' That's the subjunctive mood."
The person will leave you alone. On the other hand, if he/she looks
like a promising prospect, just reply
Let me help you practice.
In some cases, the misuse of "was" for "were" actually gives the
sentence a different meaning.
If Melissa was behind the curtain with a gun, she could have
stopped her sister from fucking him. {This sentence suggests that
Melissa was actually behind the curtain and therefore could have taken
the designated action.}
If Vicky were behind the curtain with a gun, she could have
stopped her sister from fucking him. {This sentence clearly means that
Vicky wasn't behind the curtain, but she could have taken this action
if she would have been there.}
If you want to use a more elegant expression, you can even omit the
"If" and convey the idea by using the subjunctive with an altered word
order. For example, the preceding example could become:
Were Vicky behind the curtain with a gun, she could have stopped
her sister from fucking him. {This sentence clearly means that Vicky
wasn't behind the curtain, but she could have taken this action if she
would have been there.}
It's good to know about this usage, because when you use it people know
you're making an unusual point. {Shakespeare does this effectively in
Julius Caesar, III, ii, 237-239: "Were I Brutus, and Brutus Antony,
there were an Antony would ruffle up your spirits....} It lets the
listener know you're "in the mood." This line has worked for me:
Were you as good a lover as Piers Brosnan, your tongue would be
moving a little faster right now.
Use this approach sparingly.